North Dakota St.
Men
-
Women
2012
-
2013 -
2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
429 |
Brecca Wahlund |
SO |
20:50 |
515 |
Maddie McClellan |
SR |
20:58 |
648 |
Abbi Aspengren |
JR |
21:10 |
722 |
Erin Teschuk |
FR |
21:15 |
868 |
Heidi Peterson |
SR |
21:25 |
2,516 |
Paige Stratioti |
SO |
23:07 |
2,799 |
Kayla Woltz |
FR |
23:32 |
2,805 |
taylor janssen |
FR |
23:32 |
3,111 |
Megan Feyereisen |
JR |
24:05 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
4.8% |
Top 10 in Regional |
31.8% |
Top 20 in Regional |
99.9% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Brecca Wahlund |
Maddie McClellan |
Abbi Aspengren |
Erin Teschuk |
Heidi Peterson |
Paige Stratioti |
Kayla Woltz |
taylor janssen |
Megan Feyereisen |
Stanford Invitational |
09/28 |
1162 |
|
20:53 |
21:01 |
21:18 |
21:36 |
23:01 |
23:29 |
24:19 |
|
SDSU Classic |
10/04 |
1096 |
21:01 |
20:56 |
20:57 |
21:07 |
21:23 |
22:52 |
23:18 |
23:54 |
24:04 |
Summit League Championships |
11/02 |
1105 |
20:44 |
21:07 |
21:14 |
21:12 |
21:31 |
23:49 |
23:37 |
23:04 |
|
Midwest Region Championships |
11/15 |
1202 |
|
21:03 |
21:44 |
21:25 |
21:13 |
|
23:52 |
23:04 |
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
31.0 |
809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
Region Championship |
100% |
11.7 |
343 |
|
|
0.7 |
1.6 |
2.5 |
3.5 |
4.2 |
5.5 |
6.5 |
7.3 |
9.6 |
11.2 |
13.3 |
15.0 |
10.1 |
5.0 |
2.2 |
1.2 |
0.5 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Brecca Wahlund |
0.0% |
174.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maddie McClellan |
0.0% |
172.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abbi Aspengren |
0.0% |
186.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erin Teschuk |
0.0% |
203.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heidi Peterson |
0.0% |
240.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paige Stratioti |
0.0% |
250.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kayla Woltz |
0.0% |
251.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Brecca Wahlund |
43.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
1.2 |
1.4 |
Maddie McClellan |
52.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
Abbi Aspengren |
70.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
Erin Teschuk |
77.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
Heidi Peterson |
93.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paige Stratioti |
213.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kayla Woltz |
224.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
0.7% |
2.8% |
| |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
0.0 |
3 |
4 |
1.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
4 |
5 |
2.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
5 |
6 |
3.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
4.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
5.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
6.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
7.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
9.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
11.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
13.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
15.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
10.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
5.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
2.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
19 |
20 |
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
20 |
21 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |